'It must be recalled, however, that Orientalism was not just about representations or stereotypes of the Orient but about how these were linked and integral to projects of domination that were ongoing. This raises an uncomfortable question about all our work of the combating-stereotype sort — and I would include here not just these books but many others that show how active, practical, powerful, and resourceful (as opposed to passive, silent, and oppressed) Middle Eastern women are or how complex gender relations are, including my own ethnography of the Awlad ‘Ali, Writing Women’s Worlds: Bedouin Stories. First, we have to ask what Western liberal values we may be unreflectively validating in proving that “Eastern” women have agency, too. Second, and more importantly, we have to remind ourselves that although negative images of women or gender relations in the region are certainly to be deplored, offering positive images or “nondistorted” images will not solve the basic problem posed by Said’s analysis of Orientalism. The problem is about the production of knowledge in and for the West. As [Meyda] Yegenoglu puts it, following Said’s more Foucauldian point, the power of Orientalism comes from “its power to construct the very object it speaks about and from its power to produce a regime of truth about the other and thereby establish the identity and the power of the subject that speaks about it”**. As long as we are writing for the West about “the other,” we are implicated in projects that establish Western authority and cultural difference.’

- Lila Abu-Lughod, “‘Orientalism’ and Middle East Feminist Studies,” Feminist Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Spring, 2001).

** ‘… if we admit that the power of Orientalism does not stem from the “distortion” of the “reality” of the Orient, nor from the dissemination of ”prejudiced” or “negative” images about other cultures and peoples, but from its power to construct the very object it speaks about and from its power to produce a regime of truth about the other and thereby establish the identity and the power of the subject that speaks about it, then it becomes a peripheral concern whether the images deployed to this end are ”positive” or “negative.”’

- Meyda Yegenoglu, Colonial Fantasies: Towards a Feminist Reading of Orientalism, Cambridge, 1998.

 
  1. shralec reblogged this from egoisme-a-deux
  2. egoisme-a-deux reblogged this from aloofshahbanou
  3. tiny-forest-spirit reblogged this from monetizeyourcat
  4. clithium reblogged this from basednkrumah
  5. monetizeyourcat reblogged this from basednkrumah
  6. man2ntom reblogged this from the-uncensored-she
  7. sanguina reblogged this from theuntitledmag
  8. alittlenonsensenow reblogged this from knotintime
  9. meatsuit reblogged this from aloofshahbanou
  10. tout--ou--rien reblogged this from theuntitledmag
  11. verdelapiel reblogged this from izotecipotx
  12. amipunkyet reblogged this from theuntitledmag
  13. shabaash reblogged this from aloofshahbanou
  14. the-uncensored-she reblogged this from aloofshahbanou
  15. virginiatruth reblogged this from theuntitledmag
  16. leftistshuffle reblogged this from theuntitledmag
  17. paradelle reblogged this from theuntitledmag
Opaque  by  andbamnan